Yesterday, I finished reading Joe Haldeman’s remarkable
book, The Forever War (1974). The
novel concerns William Mandella, a space marine sent with others to the
farthest reaches of the galaxy to fight against an inscrutable alien race with
whom human’s can’t communicate. (Think of the “buggers” from Ender’s game.)
The Forever War presents
several provocative speculative inventions. First, the soldiers that are
drafted to fight in the war are the intellectual elite; this is not a war
fought by the underprivileged. The army also allows both men and women. Second, the soldiers experience extreme “time dilation,” a
result of traveling through space at close to light speed. From Earth’s
reference frame, the war lasts nearly 1000 years. For the soldiers, however, it
spans less than a decade. Part of the novel then concerns how Mandella and
others become alienated from events on Earth, how they cope with radically
changing cultural, economic, and political situations. In a sense, this
allegorizes the plight of any soldier returning home from battle to a home now
unfamiliar. Indeed, Hadleman’s work is in part a reaction to his own experience
as a Vietnam veteran.
While the soldiers are away fighting with the Taurans (who
live in the constellation Taurus) over bleak, frozen planetoids orbiting “collapsars”
pivotal to interstellar travel, Earth experiences massive population growth and
becomes a quasi-socialist bureaucracy. Jobs are scarce and supplied by the
government. Most of the population lives on a form of social welfare. Food rations
are distributed by the United Nations; everyone is fed, but not most are not
fed enough. Cities are violent and people openly carry guns to protect
themselves or hire individual body guards. Even rural areas, in which
agricultural communes have formed, are threatened by guerilla raids. Mandella’s
mother is ill, but because she is elderly, she has been given a “zero priority
rating” to receive medical healthcare. After she dies, Mandella reenlists in
the military, resigned to the fact that Earth is no longer the place he once
knew.
During another campaign against the Taurans, Mandella loses
his leg and has an advanced prosthesis integrated into this body (the medical
technician actually doesn’t use the word “prosthesis,” because the leg that is
attached to Mandella is covered with his own flesh and nerves). When he
recovers and is reassigned, he finds that homosexuality has in fact become the
norm (in order to curb population growth on Earth), and that heterosexuality is
a deviant behavior. As the new commander of his strike unit, his soldiers call
him the “Old Queer.” The “Eugenics Council” on Earth has also attempted to
eliminate racial difference from the population, and humans are trending toward
one racially-ambiguous (and non-white) set of features.
In many respects, The
Forever War is a staunchly humanistic novel. Most of the novel’s
speculative inventions examine how war and the political and economic apparatus
that sustains war threaten the individual. The Eugenics Council and healthcare
priority ratings are examples of how the novel critiques technocratic
government. Combat likewise dehumanizes the individual: Mandella can calculate,
using a logistics computer, his and his fellow soldiers chance of survival
during any particular mission; he is expendable. During combat, he is given
drugs that eliminate fear, anxiety, or remorse for the enemy. The time dilation
effect alienates him from Earth, and even threatens to alienate him forever
from his lover. The complex of machines and technologies that sustain the war position
the human as a relatively trivial actor within a larger cybernetic system.
Indeed, automated lasers do most of the work during the fighting, space combat
is painfully drawn out (because it occurs over such massive distances) and the
soldiers spend most of their time in a gravitational stasis to allow them to
survive the extreme g-force maneuvers their spacecraft must make in order to
evade enemy fire. While they are in stasis, the ship’s logistic computer does
the fighting for them. In order to fight on the surface of planets, the
soldiers wear powered-armor suits that amplify their strength and provide life
support.
At the novel’s end, Earth has become one singular
consciousness, named “Man.” Individual humans are only appendages, although
they number in the billions, of this macro-consciousness. Mandella and the
survivors of his unit are the last to return home. They learn from “Man” that
the war was caused by a lack of communication with the Taurans, and that politicians
deceitfully pursued the conflict for economic reasons. The novel does end on a
bright note, however: “Man” gives Mandella a note from his lover telling him
she has kept herself in a “time machine” (by traveling at near the speed of
light) until he returned to Earth.
If the novel is posthumanist, it could be through its critique of essential gender: although Hadleman (or at least his narrator) lament the dehumanizing effects of the war machine(s), the novel does suggest that gender and sexuality are constructed categories that change fluidly over time. The female soldiers in the “homosex” (who are birthed through technological means) describe penile penetration (of the vagina) as “disgusting” and “unnatural.” Hadleman is skirting some tricky territory here, but I feel he ultimately refuses equating non-reproductive sex or birth outside the womb as degenerate or sub-human activities.
As a humanist, if I can label him as such, Haldeman seems reluctant
to let go of the idea of “freedom” or “choice.” Earth’s bureaucratic/technocratic
government and the cybernetic war machine threaten human autonomy and the
sacrosanct individual, and thus cannot be recuperated.
The idea that Earth becomes one singular consciousness at the end recalls for me Kurzweil's idea that we will saturate matter with intelligence at some point. It also recalls the idea of the Gaia hypothesis. I should note --as you no doubt will find out -- Phil talks about The Forever War in Between Two Deaths in his last chapter (if i'm not mistaken, its been 2.5 or 3 years since I've read his text). Phil's reading might not be "posthumanist," but I think he does use it as figuring a new possible political regime.
ReplyDeleteFinally, I am intrigued by your comment that he doesn't actually get a "prosthesis" since his leg is constructed with his "own" cells, given my own work on Posthumanism and tissue engineering. Is there anything in the text that explores this further, or does it seem like a minor point?
The "technician" working on Mandella's leg is (from Mandella's perspective) from the future, so to speak, because of time dilation. Thus, the novel suggests the technician doesn't use the word "prosthesis" because it's (from the technician's perspective) archaic and antiquated. He specifically says it connotes, for him, images of wooden legs and claws and what not. Apparently, the fact that this leg is integrated directly into the body and incorporates skin and nerve tissue, eventually becoming indistinguishable from a normal leg (except that it's grafted onto a metal endoskeletal structure), warrants his claim that the leg is not a prosthesis. This makes sense given that they seem to have developed advanced medical technology to help the veterans, so replacement of limbs and other body parts is ingrained in their culture. They don't seem to use the technology to become trans- or post- human, however...
ReplyDelete